Redefining Rockel

You know I never discuss female thermodynamics - Lou; Rescue Me

Poll
Rockel Recipes
Peeps
Politics
News
Fake News
Stuff
The Film of the Week
The WORD of the Week

Matthew 3:7-10

But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees coming to where he was baptizing, he said to them: "You brood of vipers! Who warned you to flee from the coming wrath?

Produce fruit in keeping with repentance.

And do not think you can say to yourselves, 'We have Abraham as our father.' I tell you that out of these stones God can raise up children for Abraham.

The ax is already at the root of the trees, and every tree that does not produce good fruit will be cut down and thrown into the fire.


Stupid Fact of the Week
There was only one civilian casualty during the three-day Battle of Gettysburg

18 October, 2005
Back in the Habit
For those who are just getting into the habit of perusing this virtual oasis of absurdity, you may have missed some excellent comments from several interesting minds concerning the topic, "Humankind, Creatures of Habit." Never fear, you can find said comments here.

To continue...

Tyreal made an excellent point, showing an apparent correlation between habit and efficiency/productivity. In America, the land of Survival of the Productive, it is interesting to apply this idea to the work force. However, I think it is only natural, or professional or some such word, to attempt to pattern your behavior at work in a manner that accomplishes the most in the least amount of time. I'm not sure this is the heart of the issue, however.

He never mentioned that he felt man was inherently a creature of habit, but rather suggested that man chooses to adopt habits (and later "forget" them), which he referred to as a necessity in today's world. Although this is not a clear answer, if one exists, to the question, or quandary, posed earlier as to the nature of man, it does bring up another interesting facet to this discussion. That being the necessity of efficiency. Tyreal almost makes it sound that habits are merely the tools man uses to achieve an end. I hope I'm not taking that too far out of context, please correct me if I am.

Whether the previous definition of "Creature," involving an idea of enslavement or indebtedness, holds to be true, the phrase "Creature of Habit" seems to imply on it's own that the creature is somehow dependent on the "habit," since it is "habit" that defines (or, perhaps, modifies) the word "creature."

Under what Tyreal has said (this sounds a bit accusatory, "He said,"... this is not how I mean it...), it would seem more that man is above habit, as it is he who decides to begin such actions that would lead to a habit. This is interesting because it would seem, and might even seem incredibly obvious to some, that habits can be broken, as man is above, not enslaved to, habit. The statistics for people quitting smoking is not good... they're actually quite horrible... but the fact remains that some people do quit; they break the habit.

People break bad habits all the time: smoking, thumb sucking past infant-hood, biting fingernails, etc. This would seem to remove from possibility the idea that man is in fact bound somehow by habit. But then what about those repeat-offender stats and, as Doyle pointed out, FBI profiling?

But does one really ever break a habit, or just transfer it? The most popular example of this is smokers who gain weight when they quit because they eat to keep their minds off smoking. Or a lot of people choose to chew gum... does that then become a habit... is it a vicious cycle?

Mr. Turmel: I am incredibly enthused to have your words on my page. Welcome. Your comments concerning "Creature" were very interesting, and in-line with where I thought giving that definition might lead to. I think those questions are well worth serious thought and would like to discuss them at some point in the (near) future when I can really apply myself.

As you can see, I've managed to say quite a lot without getting anywhere. Feel free to attempt to make sense of any of this.

(Again, Tyreal, I apologize if anything came out as negative toward you.. it seemed a little iffy on a re-read, but I couldn't think of any other way to reword the entire thing... I was really just trying to understand more fully some of the things you brought to light, and perhaps take them one step further... and, again, please feel free to correct.)
posted by Rockel @ 10:49 AM  
4 Comments:
  • At 18/10/05 4:47 PM, Blogger Doyle said…

    Here's another thought for you on the "creature of habit" idea. This is from my collection of hunting knowledge. Many deer each year are shot, especially during bow season, by a hunter that has specifically patterned their behavior. Obviously, most deer are shot in the morning and evening as they are going to and from feeding, however some bucks can be patterned during the rut as they follow their scrape line and mark their territory on a daily basis. Humans are different from this in that we can decide which habits to follow, instead of having instinct choose habits for us. Granted, there are boundaries set on what we can and cannot do, but overall we have a great deal more control over how we act and react in situations than most wild animals who rely on instict rather than intelligence.

     
  • At 19/10/05 11:25 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Tyreal: I'm going to abduct a bit of your argument and expound on it for a while. You stated that the definition of 'creature of habit' could only refer to the propensity humanity has of making habits. While this may or may not have intricate genetic ties, some research has come out recently that has suggested a high degree of corrolation between the genetic make-up and behavior of an organism.
    Granted, the studies were done in fruit flies and nematode worms (itty bitty guys smaller than regular earthworms), but when modified, a worm that was a 'loner' became a 'social', and vice versa. Our own genome is more complex than these, and we operate under the assumption of independant thought and choices, but what if...

     
  • At 19/10/05 7:05 PM, Blogger Doyle said…

    Well, along with the genetic goes the taught. We may have an inclination, but what are we taught by those who influence us as we form? This is also something to ponder. Some of the things we see people fall into as "habits" that are bad are there because of the fact that they saw something in their family that said that it was OK. This opens up a whole new can of worms, but also connects back to the original question of habits being conscious or unconscious.

     
  • At 20/10/05 1:07 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Doyle: I have to agree with you, the taught cannot be ignored. There are the people that rise from and fall into the dregs of humanity regardless of their starting point. Has anyone read 'Brave New World'? That book seems to tie in greatly to the discussion here.
    In brief, children are raised under very controlled conditions, and molded into a socially acceptable form, with there being an elaborate caste system set into place so that all the tasks in the society get taken care. They are raised under constant conditional pressure, being subconsciously impregnated with certain thoughts and prejudices that guide them along their lives. These also involve the creation of certain habits for them, but they existed unconsciously for those people.

    How many habits are foisted upon us regardless of our own thoughts on the matter? I don't know if we can buttonhole habits as being conscious or unconscious...I think that we unconsciously seek habits that enable us to function effectively. As to conscious habits, or their purpose...I have more pondering to do on that one.

     
Post a Comment
<< Home
 
About Me

Name: Rockel
Home:
About Me:
See my complete profile
Recent Comments
News Ticker
Search the Rockel
Previous Posts
Archives
Lyrics of the Week

ON THE NICKEL
by Tom Waits

("I'd like to do a new song here. This is eh, it's about downtown Los Angeles on 5th Street. And eh all the winos affectionately refer to it as The Nickel. So this is kind of a hobo's lullaby.")

sticks and stones will break my bones,
but i always will be true, and when
your mama is dead and gone,
i'll sing this lullabye just for you,
and what becomes of all the little boys,
who never comb their hair,
well they're lined up all around the block,
on the nickel over there.

so you better bring a bucket,
there is a hole in the pail,
and if you don't get my letter,
then you'll know that i'm in jail,
and what becomes of all the little boys,
who never say their prayers,
well they're sleepin' like a baby,
on the nickel over there.

and if you chew tobacco, and wish upon a star,
well you'll find out where the scarecrows sit,
just like punchlines between the cars,
and i know a place where a royal flush,
can never beat a pair, and even thomas jefferson,
is on the nickel over there.

so ring around the rosie, you're sleepin' in the rain,
and you're always late for supper,
and man you let me down again,
i thought i heard a mockingbird, roosevelt knows where,
you can skip the light, with grady tuck,
on the nickel over there.

so what becomes of all the little boys,
who run away from home,
well the world just keeps gettin' bigger,
once you get out on your own,
so here's to all the little boys,
the sandman takes you where,
you'll be sleepin' with a pillowman,
on the nickel over there.

so let's climb up through that button hole,
and we'll fall right up the stairs,
and i'll show you where the short dogs grow,
on the nickel over there.

45113638_202b79dc11