Poll |
|
Rockel Recipes |
|
Peeps |
|
Politics |
|
News |
|
Fake News |
|
Stuff |
|
The Film of the Week |
|
The WORD of the Week |
Matthew 3:7-10
But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees coming to where he was baptizing, he said to them: "You brood of vipers! Who warned you to flee from the coming wrath?
Produce fruit in keeping with repentance.
And do not think you can say to yourselves, 'We have Abraham as our father.' I tell you that out of these stones God can raise up children for Abraham.
The ax is already at the root of the trees, and every tree that does not produce good fruit will be cut down and thrown into the fire.
|
Stupid Fact of the Week |
There was only one civilian casualty during the three-day Battle of Gettysburg
|
|
02 November, 2007 |
WWJA10.9MDT? |
|
posted by Rockel @ 2:12 PM |
|
2 Comments: |
-
c'mon rock. the right to bear arms is not the right to shoot someone in the face. Sure; these people have the right to proclaim their message. They don't, however, have to right to invade this family's privacy nor do they have to right to inflict undue distress. (which was what they were found guilty of.) This makes me think of the people who defended president Clinton by saying "its none of our business what Clinton does in his private life" as if he was impeached for getting a BJ. He was impeached for lying under oath. Similarly, this church wasn't prosecuted because of what they said; it was more about when,where and how they said it.
-
Charlie. Excellent to hear from you and major congrats on the engagement. I wish you both a long and loving life together.
I believe I was probably a bit confusing with my writing, and for that I apologise, as I most certainly agree with you that "the right to bear arms is not the right to shoot someone in the face." My point was that affording everyone the opportunity to bear arms opened the door for people to abuse that right (the shooting of the face being the abuse, not the right), but that should not be enough to deter us from making the right available. An occasional face being shot, then, is the price. I hope that makes a bit more sense.
As to what they were actually found guilty of (and I should have posted this originally): - $2.9M was for compensatory damages (which is defined as "Money awarded to reimburse actual costs, such as medical bills and lost wages. Also awarded for things that are harder to measure, such as pain ...") - $6M was for punitive damages and invasion of privacy (punitive damages being defined as "Money awarded to an injured person, over and above the measurable value of the injury, in order to punish the person who hurt him.") - $2M was for emotional distress (defined as "Mental or psychological pain that may give rise to damages in a personal injury lawsuit.")
As this total dollar amount was (as noted) well above the net worth of the defendent (church), and that over half of the amount was punitive, I find the amount to be excessive.
My claim that the judgement was unwarranted was based primarily on this staggeringly large figure. Had the church members been arrested and spent a few hours in jail for their actions I would not be writing this post. I realize that people who are otherwise carrying out a "peaceful protest" will flirt with that line of inciting a riot or disturbing the peace and will be hauled off to the slammer. I don't see that as a serious threat to our concept and interpretation of the first amendment. But for a court to hand down the sentence above I feel is just adding a wrong (and an illogical, unconstitutional wrong at that) on top of a (disgusting, tasteless) wrong.
As to "when, where, and how" the message was proclaimed: "when" - was whatever time the funeral was, which only matters because... "where" - they were at the funeral, which was a public event (by all acounts). Had the family decided to have a separate private ceremony with private security or some such it would be a different matter. And if invasion of privacy can be invoked for the disturbance of ones personal space in a public arena, Britney Spears would make several Billion a day off of how many photogs invade her privacy. "how" - As I have stated before, I find their methods disgusting. However, protesting and picketing has always involved making people feel horrible about eating meat, or destroying the planet, or murdering babies.
|
|
<< Home |
|
|
|
|
About Me |
Name: Rockel
Home:
About Me:
See my complete profile
|
Recent Comments |
|
News Ticker |
|
Search the Rockel |
|
Previous Posts |
|
Archives |
|
Lyrics of the Week |
ON THE NICKEL
by Tom Waits
("I'd like to do a new song here. This is eh, it's about downtown Los Angeles on 5th Street. And eh all the winos affectionately refer to it as The Nickel. So this is kind of a hobo's lullaby.")
sticks and stones will break my bones,
but i always will be true, and when
your mama is dead and gone,
i'll sing this lullabye just for you,
and what becomes of all the little boys,
who never comb their hair,
well they're lined up all around the block,
on the nickel over there.
so you better bring a bucket,
there is a hole in the pail,
and if you don't get my letter,
then you'll know that i'm in jail,
and what becomes of all the little boys,
who never say their prayers,
well they're sleepin' like a baby,
on the nickel over there.
and if you chew tobacco, and wish upon a star,
well you'll find out where the scarecrows sit,
just like punchlines between the cars,
and i know a place where a royal flush,
can never beat a pair, and even thomas jefferson,
is on the nickel over there.
so ring around the rosie, you're sleepin' in the rain,
and you're always late for supper,
and man you let me down again,
i thought i heard a mockingbird, roosevelt knows where,
you can skip the light, with grady tuck,
on the nickel over there.
so what becomes of all the little boys,
who run away from home,
well the world just keeps gettin' bigger,
once you get out on your own,
so here's to all the little boys,
the sandman takes you where,
you'll be sleepin' with a pillowman,
on the nickel over there.
so let's climb up through that button hole,
and we'll fall right up the stairs,
and i'll show you where the short dogs grow,
on the nickel over there.
|
|
|
|
c'mon rock.
the right to bear arms is not the right to shoot someone in the face. Sure; these people have the right to proclaim their message. They don't, however, have to right to invade this family's privacy nor do they have to right to inflict undue distress. (which was what they were found guilty of.)
This makes me think of the people who defended president Clinton by saying "its none of our business what Clinton does in his private life" as if he was impeached for getting a BJ. He was impeached for lying under oath. Similarly, this church wasn't prosecuted because of what they said; it was more about when,where and how they said it.